Imminent Disaster Interview
| Interview by Chloe Gallagher. June 2010. Imminent Disaster Imminent Disaster is an emerging Brooklyn based artist focusing on large scale installations on the street and in galleries. Her work is driven by the ephemerality and decay of modern urban life and the vestiges of human narrative visible and becoming invisible within it. Disaster’s most recent works build on the idea that the gradual loss of memory is an inevitable part of human mortality. She has shown at Carmichael Gallery in LA, Ad Hoc Art in NYC, and Irvine Contemporary in DC and was featured in Juxtapoz Magazine and The Village Voice. | ![]() Curbs & Stoops: Tell us a little about how you got started in art in the first place. Imminent Disaster: The real answer is that I started doing it as a kid. My 1st grade teacher was pretty confident that one day I’d be an artist. But really, I’ve always been someone who is stuck in my imagination and trying to make some of those imagined worlds real, whether it be a quilt or a garden or a print or a drawing. Curbs & Stoops: I read that you went through a design program with a focus on print making. How did this knowledge-base factor into the beginnings of your experimentation with street art? How is it part of your process now? Imminent Disaster: Printmaking as a starting point for a street artist makes complete sense, because printmaking is about creating multiples. They’re not precious, you can make hundreds, and then the question is where do you put them? Printmakers early in their career usually aren’t selling out their editions. Putting them up on the street seems to be a natural progression for the printmaker. You start to get attention and build a career that can sell those editions of hundreds of prints. I think it’s hard to ignore the fact that street art has become a venue for independent artists to get attention for their work. In many ways, the tactics used by street artists and guerrilla advertisers are the same, and you can see the effects in the street artists who have transitioned into completely commercial artists, who now are getting hired to design ads or sneakers. In my maturing ideas of what street art is, I’m aware that it can be a boost for a premature gallery career. For that reason, I’m putting up less work now than I was a year ago. I want to put up work that I love, and has a reason to be on the street, and that has care put into how it is made. Curbs & Stoops: You started making street art by doing “culture jamming” and smaller scale media, like stickers. Tell our readers a little about what culture jamming is and how you got involved with it. Imminent Disaster: Culture jamming is an action against commercial advertising, that uses the language and imagery of the advertisers to subvert their message. I got involved because as a teenager I thought I wanted to be a graphic designer, until I realized that that meant a life of selling products that didn’t need to be made in the first place, and that I didn’t stand behind ethically. I was working within my skill set to do something that I thought undercut a system I found soul-sucking and horrible. But culture-jamming is also limited because it’s dependent on the language of advertising for it’s material to subvert. Art is ultimately better because the whole thing is newly imagined by the artist, and in the ideal sense it’s completely free of advertising as an influence.
Curbs & Stoops: How did your street art start evolving into larger scale work? When it did start growing in complexity and size how did your approach change? You work in NYC, does it ever get a little scary out there as a young woman? Imminent Disaster: It started evolving as soon as I was able. In school, I was always pushing the limits of the print shop to make the biggest silkscreen or block print. Once out of school, I had the time to focus on my own practice and was able to put much more time into even bigger things. For some reason I am drawn viscerally to large scale work, and I think it has something to do with the largeness of the motions, and the way it fragments your vision while you are working on it. You can never see the whole thing at once while you are making it, so you are building partially blind. You have to trust your hand when you’re actually up close, making contact with the piece. And it’s only when you step back that you can see exactly what you’ve done. Curbs & Stoops: Do you have a different mind set when you approach a piece that you are making for the street than a piece you are making for a gallery show? In terms of style and content the pieces you make for your gallery shows seem to differ quite a bit from the wheat pastes and constructions you make for the street. Are they different dialogues, or the same discussion conducted in different dialects? Imminent Disaster: Yes, they’re different processes. Anything I make for the street I have to accept it’s eventual destruction. Also, the street is less suitable for 3-dimensional work. A lot of my gallery work recently has been the development of the paper cut outs as sculptural pieces… something that wouldn’t be possible on the street. Curbs & Stoops: Reading over your artist statement you make some powerful, eloquent comments about the construction of the human psyche relating to the growth of a city as a sort of organism. How did you formulate these ideas? When did you first see memory as a metaphor for the city, or vice versa as the case may be. Imminent Disaster: I think I see memory in everything that humanity touches. It’s something that is unique to us, as far as we know. I see the human touch in the things that we make… and cities are one of those things. The amazing thing about cities is that they are so complex, and so temporal in their development. Some areas feel older, because more of their past has been preserved, and other areas have obliterated their visible history. I don’t think of the city as a metaphor, but as an extension of our thought process, individual and collective. It’s simultaneously intelligible and obscured, it’s perfectly present and completely mysterious.
Curbs & Stoops: Your work seems to revel in it’s innate ephemerality, picking up on themes of decay, reconstruction and mutation. Was it easy for you to accept the transient nature of street art, or was that a process, going from a fine art base to a medium in which you as an artist must leave your creation at the mercy of the environment and the community as a whole? Imminent Disaster: I think everyone in this moment accepts the ephemeral. It’s part of our current social and cultural condition. Everything is constantly changing and it’s a struggle to stay on the top of the heap; the newsfeed, the webblog. If you’re not constantly updating, and pouring information out into the world you will be forgotten. The street somehow manifests that overall cultural process for me. It’s also horrible: the pressure to continually produce. Because the wheatpaste is so ephemeral, the work of getting up is really never ending. Curbs & Stoops: Tell us a little about your influences. Stylistically your work has a sort of 18th-19th century vibe, with a heavy print making influence, almost like large scale woodblocks. Where do you cultivate your imagery from? What kind of narratives are you drawn to, and what kind of stories do you like to tell? Imminent Disaster: I think the old illustration influence is present.… for me working in paper and in relief, my question is how do I make a flat value look like a gradation of value. Some of the master engravers of the past have exemplified possibilities of how to do that. I’ve been told my work is classical looking, but I’m not entirely sure what are all of the factors that make it seem that way. I try not to take imagery from existing art or illustration… I work from an imagined idea, and if I need to reference something I have my friends pose and take my own photos. I’ve also stopped trying to think of 2-dimensional work as a narrative. Visual work does not do the same thing language does. I think my work has developed in a positive direction after abandoning the idea of literary narrative. Curbs & Stoops: You’ve had a lot of really successful gallery shows in the last couple years all across the US. It seems like your career took off pretty fast. How did your momentum build so quickly? How did that change effect your process? Imminent Disaster: I have no idea! Maybe a combination of being in the right place at the right time. It’s also slowed down a bit since the recession, which is a bit of a relief. I’m enjoying the time to develop my practice without the pressure of selling work.
Curbs & Stoops You’ve done some amazing shows with artists who’s style compliment yours perfectly, like Gaia and Armsrock. Were these collaborations or the work of clever curators? Do you ever collaborate with other street artists? Imminent Disaster: Working with Armsrock was the only real collaboration I’ve done with a street artist inside a gallery. When Gaia and I have shown together it’s always very much that we are doing our own thing in the same space. Armsrock and I developed the theme together, did our show pieces separately, and then were really involved in every step of the installation process. Amazingly, our voices seemed to cohere very well in that show, which I think is an extremely unusual thing. Finding someone to really collaborate with is a very difficult thing to do. Curbs & Stoops: What kinds of projects do you have coming up in the future? Imminent Disaster: Some life projects, a mural project in Philadephia, applying for Grad school, working on a series of charcoal drawings, going to drawing classes, learning to weld and starting a sculpture. Curbs & Stoops: What kind of advice would you give to artists looking to make a unique impact on the street art scene? Any words of wisdom for female artists specifically? Imminent Disaster: Do it because you love it and believe in it, and not because you want fame. Ladies, define your own terms… don’t feel pressured into doing things you don’t feel safe doing. |


















